top of page


AI with Sign Language Must Be Deaf-Led, Independent, and Accountable
A welcome step from WFD This morning, I welcomed the WFD (World Federation of the Deaf) LinkedIn post about its Ad Hoc Group on Artificial Intelligence . I praise WFD for recognising that AI must be approached through human rights, accessibility, inclusion, and sign language perspectives . That is an important step forward. I hope this leads to trusted global leadership and real protection for Deaf communities as AI continues to develop at speed. Looking for country-level act
Tim Scannell
2 days ago6 min read


A Voice for Justice: Deaf-Led AI, Independent Ethics, and Hope for Sign Language Futures
After my recent blog, I have been contacted by people beyond the UK asking what lessons should now be learned from AI and sign language. That matters. It tells me this is no longer just a British conversation. People in other countries are watching closely, asking what has happened so far, what has improved, what has not, and whether Deaf communities are truly helping shape these technologies or are still being asked to accept decisions made elsewhere. For me, that leads to t
Tim Scannell
5 days ago2 min read


Who Gave Approval for AI with Sign Language?
AI with sign language is moving fast. Accountability is not. Too many claims are appearing in very high numbers. Too many organisations are still avoiding a clear public position. And too often, the discussion seems more focused on protecting AI than protecting people. That is why my question remains simple: Who gave approval for AI with sign language? Alt text: Bold campaign graphic on a dark background. Large white and yellow text says, “AI with sign language is moving fast
Tim Scannell
Mar 243 min read
bottom of page





